canon 135mm f2 astrophotography

Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. Just place your subject against a distant background, and half of the job is done. There is no agreement about what Bokeh means. I had both for a while. Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ?? Contrasty, saturated, nice colours. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. when you hold the lens in your hand you know you are holding a fine peice of optical equipment. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. And in their task to get that blurry background, they most often throw their main subject out of focus and/or to focus for anything else in the photograph that would make it, and end results are just "gear porn". Let's the games begin! Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. I have a 135mm f2.8 lens I've used for wide DSOs but mostly I use 200mm. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. No more inside shooting with flash! The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. It's an ideal portrait lens. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. Great reach for street shots. When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results. Whos Afraid of a Phantom: Istar Phantom 140mm F/6.5, that is? As soon as e.g. Some reviewers have listed lack of IS as a "Con". There is no doubt that the 135L deserves it excellent reputation for image quality. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. I wanted to add my experience with some lenses that I thought worthy of being considered too, and some of the equipment that I have used. this lens typifies modern design being confined to sharpness, colour & bokeh. If they could make 135 f2 lighter version with AF for Sony and price is slightly under Sigma 135 /1.8 and obviously Batis 135 2.8 it could sell like hotcakes. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. My tests on it are described on http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/canonlens135.html, i have never been a prime lens fan, just seems to leave you feeling trapped in a single dimension. . There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. AF is accurate and very fast. In fact, it might be fun to try! Some APOs can be fitted with pricey telecompressors, but those invariably result in vignetting and coma. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. Round one of polls are now open, pick your winners and share your voice. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. The following image was captured by Eric Cauble using the Samyang branded version of this lens. I'm enjoying the Sigma Art 135mm - it's notably sharper than the Canon (which I owned at the same time), and it's f/1.8 instead of f/2. I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . Lots of wet blankets around here. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. The model I use feels solid and the barrel is constructed with metal. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. Yes the Samyang is good and yes there are lenses with bad bokeh. But ppl should know there is much better advice in the forums. I can only guarantee that the TSAPO65Q would work very well. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. Yes, she's isolated. Sharp wide open, wonderful bokeh, fast AF in dark conditions. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with ED standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the ultra multi-coated optics. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. I have an old 135/2.5 Takumar that is not bad at all, for the price. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. This is so annoying that I intend to replace the Canon lens cap with a Tamron cap. In fact, a light-weight 200/2.8 seems more interesting to own (e.g., the Minolta 200/2.8). The best ones listed below serve well with a one stop reduction, and some require two or even three stops. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. Sme of the wide field are. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. You currently have javascript disabled. This lens is available on Amazon for most camera bodies. Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. Available Monday. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? My work requires auto-focus. But you just know that there is the professionalism that is lacking here -- and the writer's Instagram page confirms that. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! Moreover if we have a serendipitous moment regarding a new (or used) lens, that's a good thing. This lens provides all of these requirements. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? Built quality is wonderful, focus ring is well-damped. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. The Samyang 135mm f/2 lens is very wide in astrophotography terms. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 Several functions may not work. It really is about talent, creativity, and vision, not gear. Dear Trevor, here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. From my experience, the toughest test on a lense is its ability to function wide open. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. If you own an EOS Camera - It's a no Brainer, Buy one It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. Many lenses lose their appeal after time, but not this one. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. I have a vintage Nikon135mm f/2.8 AI-s which produces virtually the same bokeh and weighs a quarter of this or any other 135mm AF lens. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field.

Airbnb Villalba, Puerto Rico, Old Haciendas For Sale In Mexico, Articles C