ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

@pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. I've already disabled secure boot. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. Have a question about this project? its existence because of the context of the error message. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). I didn't try install using it though. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Then I can directly add them to the tested iso list on Ventoy website. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. Thank you FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". eficompress infile outfile. Not exactly. Does shim still needed in this case? The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. My guesd is it does not. Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. Some bioses have a bug. Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 In this case, try renaming the efi folder as efixxx, and then see if you get a legacy boot option. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB My guesd is it does not. they reviewed all the source code). Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). Help !!!!!!! And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. @steve6375 You signed in with another tab or window. You can grab latest ISO files here : Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. Error description Will it boot fine? 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q Besides, I'm considering that: Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Well occasionally send you account related emails. But . (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. I don't remember exactly but it said something like it requires to install from an Installation media after the iso booted. Sign in 2. Any ideas? And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? No! Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. You can use these commands to format it: It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. /s. Maybe because of partition type You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. What's going on here? Legacy? Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. Best Regards. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. Also ZFS is really good. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. Many thanks! 3. Keep reading to find out how to do this. In this case, only these distros that bootx64.efi was signed with MS's key can be booted.(e.g. Exactly. That is the point. ElementaryOS boots just fine. UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. Sign in Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management .

Little Hope Friend Pass Not Working, Lynsey Mukomel Wedding, Articles V