4000 iu vitamin d reddit
157 were characterised as sun-seeking (S-S), and 141 were classified as sun-phobic (S-P), based on their sun exposure history. Specifically, it was when subjects were supplemented with 1000mg calcium + 800IU Vitamin D. (Source). If you look at the study I posted above on photoaging, sun-seeking women were actually perceived to be much older than they were, compared to sun-phobic women. Strong contraindication (you didn't mention because you don't know) is sarcoidosis for taking high dose Vitamin D. I generally agree with you on the 2,000/day as a minimum for an otherwise healthy adult, but 10,000IU/day is probably excessive for many (without being toxic). I am a stage IV melanoma survivor and used to take about 6000iu of vitamin D3 supplements daily but my measurable vitamin D levels never rose above 23. Topical D-analogues are beneficial for psoriasis topically, might also be true of sun exposure. Your vitamin D levels also depend on the foods you eat and any supplements you take (see Your magnesium and vitamin D intake below). One troubling result is an extreme increase in hunger cravings particularly for high-sugar foods. These results are clinically relevant, because vitamin D supplementation is widely administered to postmenopausal females for … 4. share. I am fairly sure that the tolerable upper intake implies a "high dose" of Vitamin D already, so your concern is moot if one stays well below that range (which is debated to be around 2000IU, all the way to 10,000IU). The pooled data from trials of vitamin D supplementation lasting ≥8 weeks and dosage ≤4,000 IU/day indicated that vitamin D had an effect. Not to mention, NONE of them were funded. Vitamin D3 and vitamin K2 work together directly, but the dosages of these two vitamins are independent of each other, which means that no matter how much vitamin D3 … (Source 1)(Source 2), This is the only topic of interest on Vitamin D that has substantial research behind it right now. The upper tolerable level for long-term use from supplements is 100 mcg (4000 IU) vitamin D3 per day. I wrote a comment about the functions of Vitamin D here. Infants under 12 months should not have more than 25 micrograms (1,000 IU… After about 4 months upped the dose to 50,000 IU … I've recently moved up to 5000 IU/day, but haven't yet been rechecked. That's as unbiased as you're going to get. It has so many other benefits than vitamin d. Sunscreen is probably going to give you cancer quicker than the sun. Healthy populations? STEMI heart attack, NSTEMI heart attack, Coronary Artery Spasm, Demand Ischemia? D deficiency, you should also consider taking the things mentioned above. Was regularly running at the time and before the aching started I guess I had a few months of muscle fasciculations before waking up one day with aching legs, I've had better and worse periods but it's not gone away. Got this under control by doing daily stretching of the chest. Additionally, yes, although there may be good research supporting other benefits of UV exposure, I highly advise against it due to (also) good research supporting the avoidance of UV exposure (especially regarding photoaging and skin cancer). This happens via lipid transdermal absorption, in fact we have specialized transfer proteins for this purpose and a slow but complex mechanism of storage of this substance in adipose (fat) cells whereas taking high doses of cholecalciferol via pills just overwhelms the liver which reacts by mostly flushing it out of our bodies. By the way, the Vitamin D3 produced by your skin is EXACTLY the same as supplemental Vitamin D3. Report Save. 5000-10,000IU/day Vitamin D(3) seems to be safe, and ought to confer all the benefits of Vitamin D without leading to any toxicity. However, vitamin D toxicity is more likely to develop if you take 40,000 IU/day everyday for 3 months or more. Very high levels of 25(OH)D can develop if you: take more than 10,000 IU/day (but not equal to) everyday for 3 months or more. I'm trying to play it safe here, of course -- people could easily take 1000mg and get an adequate response, but I'm trying to account for possible bioavailability issues. UV-C rays are used to sterilise food and medical equipment -- you don't want to be exposed to UV-C rays. AAD: Upper limit = 4000IU/day for adults. “Do not take more than 100 micrograms (4,000 IU) of vitamin D a day as it could be harmful. et al found small, but significant improvements in bone density in 50+ yr-olds in a meta-analysis including 29 RCTs. Money is a moot concern here. Tang. The long term effects of UV-A and UV-B exposure on the skin, The difference between dosages for both methods, The difference between Vitamin D obtained from UV-A and UV-B exposure vs supplementation, 1) The long term effects of UV-A and UV-B exposure on the skin. And, if you do have to go out in the sun or are going to be exposed to UV-A or UV-B, they suggest using a full-spectrum sunscreen that blocks both types of rays. I admit this is where I got a little carried away with the "more is better" mantra, but it is still VERY safe at this dosage. 4000 IU per days (a few days double). Increased bone resorption w/ 500mg calcium in the AM and 1000mg in the PM vs 500mg in the AM and 500 in the PM: Also, in early menopausal women, splitting up dosages into 500mg calcium in the morning and 1000mg calcium in the night leads to increased bone resorption, when compared to 1000mg t.i.d. … Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. For *muscle* fasciculations, pain or weakness, you should check with your doctor. take more than 300,000 IU in a 24 hour period. As many as 77 percent of Americans are vitamin-D deficient, according to a 2009 report in the “Archives of Internal Medicine. Then, check your vitamin D levels in your blood. Recent research seems to indicate vitamin D helps deposit calcium in the wrong places in our bodies due to excess fluorides in our diets and toothpaste. when D3 levels are X ng/dl)? Eating 100,000 IU a day for a prolonged periods of time is suspected to be problematic. Osteoporosis is more common in older populations. Maybe 3 weeks ago I started taking Vitamin D to see if it would help. Calcification of the peneal gland in our brains due to this process is thought to be a likely cause of alzheimers disease. Note: The last type of UV ray, UV-C, is filtered by the stratospheric ozone layer before reaching Earth, so unless you're in space, you won't be exposed to this. Already taking zinc and magnesium (+b6), will definitely look into the osteocare. UV-A does not provide a significant source of Vitamin D. Sun exposre might have other beneficial effects outside of just D3 synthesis... including the metabolites. Using sunscreen may decrease your skin’s production of vitamin D. Nutritional insufficiency (25 OHD 50–75 nmol/L) requires treatment with 800 to 1000 IU of vitamin D3 daily. Vitamin D is to Calcium as Piperine is to unformulated Curcumin. What can replace xxx? (Chart 2), There is conflicting research on this subject right now, but the evidence suggests that higher UV exposure can lead to increased occurrence of melanoma due to DNA damage. After another 3 months my measured vitamin D level was just over 50 and this was during the middle of winter. The main reason for supplementing Vitamin D: It helps to lower PTH (parathyroid hormone) levels, and in turn, decreases calcium accumulation in arteries and increases accumulation of calcium in the teeth and bones. Heaney et al. That and there's also things like red light/blue light/green light/infrared from sun exposure. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. No one has died from "sunscreen cancer" yet. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the Supplements community. I've never had a broken bone and going through the trouble of taking vitamin D just for a bit extra bone strength doesn't seem worth it. (Source) This is yet another reason why supplementing 1500mg/day may be more beneficial than 1000mg/day. People die from sun cancer every day. As you need UV-A and UV-B exposure to produce Vitamin D, sunscreens may decrease the amount of Vitamin D that will be produced by your skin, due to the fact that most sunscreens block UV-A and UV-B light. Unfortunately, many of these claims are unfounded -- Vitamin D should not be used as some sort of "cure-all" pill. Nutritional insufficiency (25 OHD 50–75 nmol/L) requires treatment with 800 to 1000 IU of vitamin D3 daily. You seriously don't think something proven to improve your health isn't worth $0.09 a day? The supplements subreddit aims to discuss and share topics related to nutritional supplementation. Upon realizing that taking 4,000 IU of Vitamin D3 a day was not enough for me, I embarked on a "dangerous" experiment that directly contradicted everything MD's had told me for years: ” DON'T TAKE TOO MUCH VITAMIN D IT IS DANGEROUS!” I started taking 20,000 IU a day-50X times the recommended dose of 400 IU a day. ...is the most conducive to reversing atherosclerosis (widening the arteries by getting rid of calcium deposits on the inner walls) + osteoporosis (increasing bone mineral density). A typical modern daily recomendation is about 4000 to 5000 IU a day. (Source), A daily dose of 4000 IU of vitamin D3 for two weeks was observed to be 1.7 times more effective in raising 25[OH]D levels than 4000 IU of vitamin D2. This approach gives you the vitamin D you need without increasing your risk for skin cancer. Solariums may be cheap and convenient, but it's not worth the long term damage to your skin. It is much easier to extrapolate this data to other populations (compared to something more esoteric like Rhodiola rosea), such as those suffering from age-induced osteoporosis. What's the actual, physical benefit of transporting calcium to the bones and teeth? Of course. The Food and Nutrition Board has established a tolerable upper intake level of 4,000 IU of vitamin D per day. I have used the UVB lamp for well over 5 years and while it can be misused and cause a mild sunburn, I have not noticed any new skin lesions or other problems due to its limited use. If your daily diet is varied and balanced—made up of magnesium-rich foods such as spinach, nuts, beans and wholegrains—it’s likely … In a nutshell: The idea is that the combo of... Vit. It's important to take vitamin D as you may have been indoors more than usual this year. He reacted to the latest NICE report , stating: “NICE, SACN and PHE continue to promote the idea of vitamin D 'toxicity', despite no evidence of this in trials where up to 4,000 IU/day vitamin D were used. You must be referring to Vitamin D2, the "fake" Vitamin D, which requires around 2x as much compared to D3 to obtain the same amount of absorption. Review: Vitamin D3 In Olive Oil Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin… I don't even need to ask you for sources, quite frankly. You're already taking magnesium, try taking K also and see if that helps. And yeah best to test your levels, but taking 10,000 IU a day at least to start with is reasonable. (Source). Those who supplement vitamin D may develop dangerous hypercalcemia when supplementing calcium at 1200 mg per day. Bear in mind high-dose vitamin D will be more expensive too. We’ve found vitamin D supplements containing up to 100mcg (4000 IU) both on the high street and online. C + E are potent antioxidants that protect against DNA oxidation and offer slight UV protection, so if you're going to use the UVB lamp, at least use those. P.S. Calcium promotes the formation of biofilms and can aggravate infections. Ah, here it is. I have also found that costochondritis is associated with vitamin d deficiency, which is a struggle I've had on and off for many many years, this also got worse around the time I got my muscle aches. Do Vitamins Daily D. This product is not available and will be replaced shortly. | Livestrong.com Vitamin D3 400iu x 90 Capsules, Suitable for Vegetarians, Magnesium Stearate Free, Contributes to The Maintenance of Normal Bones, Muscle Function & The Immune System, UK Manufactured 48 £7 20 (£0.08/count) How much Vitamin D was used alongside 1200mg calcium per day? This obsession has become a major hurdle to better vitamin D health in the UK. I doubt many kids come onto this sub. Requirements may differ slightly between 50-year-olds and 19-year-olds, but not by much. Yeah, but the thing is, your 741mg figure of "calcium balance" is bullshit. I assume you mean strictly adult dosing, right? 1 MED gives you approximately 10,000IU Vitamin D. It's just too unreliable to try to measure your exposure to the sun due to hundreds of factors (e.g. How significant is this problem, and when does it occur (i.e. Also, you say you are a stage IV melanoma survivor. And the mechanism that it works through to increase BMD is also very well-known, unlike something like Rhodiola rosea, where the psychoactive properties may be harder to measure than bone density. For every 1 ng/mL increase, you'll need to get an additional 100 IU of vitamin D per day (obese individuals may require double the amount).
Geotechnical Engineer Inventions, Innocent Child Archetype, Phillips Vodka Alcohol Percentage, Waco Shooting 2019, Luke 5 Commentary Easy English, What Episode Does Madara Appear, Crème Brûlée Ingredients,